The Civil War Of The United States - 1108 Words

When Dred Scott decided to gives out a serious shock to the antislavery rules that hoped to keep slavery out of the Northern territories, particularly to Senator Stephen A. Douglas s doctrine of popular sovereignty, and also acknowledged that no slave, nor offspring of a slave, could be a US citizen. As a noncitizen, the court stated, Scott did not have any rights at all; he could not sue anyone in a federal court so he just remained a slaved. So that decision had a major outcome in spreading the political and community gap between the North and the South, and conveyed the nation closer to the brink of civil war. The South celebrated, and therefore they felt a relief and justification, for at last the Southern opinion upon the subject of†¦show more content†¦Giving to Chief Justice Taney, Congress had no power to forbid slavery in the colonies for two reasons: first- the Constitution gave it only very limited power to legislate for the territories, and second slaves were pro perty, and property owners were protected due to the 5th Amendment of the Constitution. A compromise is when two or more parties in difference reach a settlement that does not give all sides precisely what they want, but plenty of what they want so that they can be happy. Compromise is the greatest possible solution to a battle however it does not always work. One needs only to look at situations such as the Bosnia-Herzegovina to see that. During the events prior to the American Civil War, many different compromises were completed in an attempt to obstruct the growing differences. However this simply longs the predictable. The differences between North and South were far too countless and compromise did not stand a chance at stopping the impending conflict. This was most clearly exposed in the ways in which the three main compromises, the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act, failed. In 1820 Missouri sought to join the Union as only a slave state. As this would ruin the stability between Slave states and Free states

Hybridity in Ezekiel Mphahleles Down Second Avenue

Hybridity in Ezekiel Mphahlele s Down Second Avenue The criticism that Mphahlele s awareness of his being a hybrid person imparts an inability to his being able to write his story himself is a criticism contrived out of literal derivations of the Greek components of the word autobiography. The textual landscape of Down Second Avenue includes many varied and detailed arenas, the rural setting and its many dimensions, the city and its many dimensions. In the sense that autobiography is part of the genre of biography in the postclassical European tradition, that being the life accounts of saints and princes, the criticism is perhaps true to some extent. However, in the aspect of the autobiography being a search for identity and†¦show more content†¦Mphahlele relates his well justified fear of the Gaza church, where in one instance the priest tries to saw off an invalid child s legs after a failed prayer healing attempt. He constantly juxtaposes the positions of the various churches on issues such as the government s education policy. He compares those aspects of each he reveres as well as those he disparages. The church is a universal phenomenon in the psyche and day to day experience of the writer throughout his childhood and early adulthood. He sees how the various churches are both a help and hindrance . His church based education of early and late childhood and his position of employment as teacher are accrued through church institutions. However, he loathes the church for the disparateness of people around him including his grandmother: The teaching that broke down a good deal of the individualism of the eastern Transvaal Africans. In this aspect Mphahlele reveals clearly both the hybridity as well as the symmetry between the various churches in his experience. An important dichotomy is Mphahlele s determined vocation as academic and teacher and his employment as messenger boy, journalist. He is fired as messenger boy under the familiar South African axiom, being cheeky. He relates how possessing an academic qualification is in fact a hindrance to obtaining basic employment. His

An Analysis of Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 Free Essays

Burning Books Ray Bradbury’s novel, Fahrenheit 451 takes places in some sort of â€Å"perfect† world. In the novel people who â€Å"think† are considered outcasts and weird. Additionally, the population has almost completely removed books from their society. We will write a custom essay sample on An Analysis of Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 or any similar topic only for you Order Now This can directly connect to modern American society in which, entertainment and material possessions seem to interest people more than books, and the small items in life remain unappreciated. Several people today do not enjoy reading. They have found an external source of entertainment in, television, radio, or music. Similar to the novel, today’s society has begun to abandon books. They don’t have much of a free will anymore and some may call it mind control. The society in the novel seems very similar to this because they never had a chance to express themselves or have unique personalities. Furthermore, various people do not appreciate the smaller items in life and look more interested in physical objects such as, money. Moreover, in Fahrenheit 451, Clarisse mentions to Montag how drivers may have not ever seen the grass or flowers, or even looked at nature. It seems like these two groups have completely removed â€Å"thinking† and â€Å"knowledge† from their lives in search of materials with â€Å"greater value. † These two societies have many similarities. Particularly, modern American society has begun placing books away and looking for other forms of entertainment. Today, individuals make it seem like money and material possessions are the most important in life. Likewise, those in Ray Bradbury’s novel appear to find more interest in Parlor walls and seashell radios instead of objects that allow more thought, such as books. How to cite An Analysis of Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, Papers

Corporation laws

Questions: Indri runs a soil-testing business. He decides to form a company to take over the business. He is the sole shareholder and sole director. Indri sells his business to the company at an inflated price and lends the company $90,000 to help meet the cost of purchase. As security for the loan, Indri arranges a mortgage over a vacant block of land, which he transferred to the company as part of the business sale. In the first year of operation, the business makes a small profit (after paying both Indri and his 20 daughter's wages), but by the end of 2012 it is clear that the building industry is going through a major slump. Indri becomes desperate and works even harder. While working late into the night, Indri badly lacerates his hand and needs micro-surgery. His efforts to keep the business afloat are in vain and the company is forced into liquidation. On realisation of the assets, it is found that the company has approximately $95,000 to go towards meeting creditors' claims of $210,000: (a) If Indri is the only secured creditor, will he get back his $90,000? (b) Can Indri claim workers' compensation, assuming that he is otherwise entitled to it? Answers: The problems associated in the given case study are if Indri is believed to get an amount of $90000 back that was supposed to be his. It was found that the sum of money was initially lent to the company and whether the compensation for the workers can be claimed by Indri for the laceration or not. The company that is being dealt with is a single owner company of which Indri is the director and the shareholder of the company. The company is normally considered to be a significant entity that is different from the shareholders. The company was established in the case of Saloman v Saloman (Saloman v Saloman, [1896]) which a company is a separate body that is totally different from the shareholders and there is a curtain between the shareholders and the company which gives a kind of immunity to the company. Yet, it is also a fact that there are a few exceptions to the distinct identity status of the company. The cases when this covering is removed, it has been outlined judiciously by the courts over a long period of time. The covering is removed at the time when the company takes the shape of a sham company or when the people in control of the company act in a fraudulant manner or when the company is used to avoid certain legal bindings (Ferber, 2002). A specific case with respect to that of Macaura v Northern Assurance co. Ltd (Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd, [1925]). In the given case M was the owner of a farm and and the standing timber over the farm. He created a company of which he was the shareholder and the director as well. The timber was insured in case of aoutbreak of fire under the name of M. in case of desturuction due to the outbreak of fire, M under his own name is able to claim for the compensation from the insurer. But in the specified case he was denied of the compensation because the required insurable interest wqas absent in the matter. It was taken into consideration that M was a shareholder of the company and that a shareholder does not have the legal name to draw the benefits (Harris, Hargovan and Adams, 2009). In case of Chen v Butterfield (Chen v Butterfield, [1996]), a single person company was not extended the protection of isolated legal body due to the fact that the court found that the main purpose of the company was to avoid personal accountability and therefore it was nothing more than a sham. In case of Permanenet Mortgages Pty Ltd v Sibylle Ulrike Macfayden (Permanent Mortgages Pty Limited v Sibylle Ulrike MacFadyen, [2012]) of Australia, the Supreme Court of new south wales found that where the company was formed with the inflated credit picture, such a company can be inferred as sham company and is not liable to be given validity under any circumstances. In case of Pilmer v Duke Group Ltd ) (Pilmer v Duke Group Ltd (In Liq), [2001]), it was considered by the high court of australia that after liquidation a company is wound up at the time of insolvency, the first person to get get the dues out of the assets are the employees, followed by the secured creditors, unsecured creditors, and at last the others. In case of any alterations, no payments is supposed to be made. In the mentioned situation Indri committed the mistake of inflating the assets of his business and forming the company. Despite of being aware of the fact that there were losses, he carried on with the bank loans and therefore it can be said that the veil of the corporate entity will be removed in the given case to have a glimpse of the real colors (Harvey, 2009). Therefore no protection can be extended to Indri and he does not have the liability to get the $90000 back. Simultaneously his injury cannot be compensated due to the fact that there is no employee protection that is extended to him. References Bank of NSW v Permanent Trustee Company of NSW Ltd[1943]HCA p.27. Barker, D. (2005).Essential Australian law. Sydney, N.S.W.: Cavendish. Chen v Butterfield[1996]NZCLC 7, p.261. Commercial Banking Company of Sydney Ltd v Love[1975]HCA p.48. Ferber, K. (2002).Corporation law. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Fletcher, K. and Fletcher, K. (2007).The law of partnership in Australia.Pyrmont, NSW: Lawbook Co.